How the 3-year clause impacts life insurance claims

Brife:
Regardless of whether a claim has arisen or not and when it is intimated, once the period of 3 years is over, the policy cannot be called in question.

The initial three years in a life insurance contract between the life insurance company and the policyholder is an important milestone.


While the rules allow insurers to repudiate (or reject) death claims within the initial three years of a life insurance policy on the ground of misrepresentation or suppression of a material fact, their hands are tied for repudiation of claims, if a death happens after this period.
However, it is important for a policyholder not to take shelter under this 3-year clause as it might be a lengthy claim settlement process for the surviving family members if the case drags into the courts.

Providing information

Life insurance contracts are based upon the legal principle of 'uberrimae fides' (utmost good faith) and hence, the potential buyer of a life insurance policy is expected to disclose all material information honestly and accurately.

At the time of applying for insurance, based on the information provided, the underwriters of the insurance companies see whether the individual buyer can be provided any coverage or not. In the absence of any such factual information, unhealthy lives may be covered posing a danger to the entire group of lives insured and may even violate contractual obligations.

Importance of initial three years of a policy

In case a claim rises during the policy period, the approach an insurer takes will largely depend on how long the policy has run. The regulation as per Section 45 of the Insurance Act allows insurers for calling a policy in question on the ground of misrepresentation or suppression of a material fact not amounting to fraud only within the initial three years of the policy. "The way the amended section 45 is worded today is that no life insurance policy can be called in question for any reason whatsoever after a period of 3 years from the date of commencement of risk or reinstatement or addition of rider. Therefore, a strict interpretation of the section would mean that even if there was a wilful non-disclosure, the right of denial of death claim is not available after the said period of 3 years. However, regardless of whether a claim has arisen or not and when it is intimated, once this period of 3 years is over, the policy cannot be called in question. The insurers are allowed to call in question a policy only within 3 years even if there is no death claim.

Repudiation within 3 years

If the policy is called in question within 3 years of date of issuance or date of commencement of risk, whichever is later, the insurer takes a decision to repudiate the policy on the ground of misrepresentation or suppression of the material fact made by the policyholder, and the premiums collected from the date of issuance till the date of repudiation shall be refunded. "Section 45(4) speaks about any incorrect statements or failure to disclose on the grounds other than fraud. Under such circumstances, by virtue of second proviso to section 45(4), refund of premiums have been advised, since it is a case of unintentional incorrect statements or non-disclosure.

However, if a fraud is established by the insurer before the end of three years, even the premium is forfeited. "Suppression of material facts or misstatements on the grounds of fraud are covered under section 45(2) - where fraud is established, the claim can be denied and premiums paid can be forfeited.

Fraud detected after 3 years

There can be instances where a fraud is established after three years. Can the insurer still call the policy in question? "On a plain reading of the section, the right to call for policy "for any reason whatsoever" curtails all rights of the life insurer. However, the reality is that there could be fraudulent claims which can be reported even after 3 years, and the hands of a life insurer are tied after a period of 3 years.

Establishment of a fraudulent contract Mentioning all medical and health related information is an important disclosure made by the policyholder in the application form. Here's an example of a fraudulent application. "The life assured does not intentionally disclose about his pre-existing illness for which treatment was taken in a hospital for a period of say, 5 years, before taking the policy and which was not disclosed in the proposal form at the time of taking the policy. If the life insurer had known about the pre-existing illness, the life insurer could have rejected the proposal itself and policy would not have been issued. This is an example of denial on fraudulent grounds.

Investment goals, on the other hand, can vary from individual to individual. It can be buying a luxurious house at a prime location or buying a premium segment car or going for a vacation abroad. There is nothing wrong in dreaming big. People have started to believe that by investing in areas which promise high returns, it is possible to fulfil some dreams of life. They are willing to take risks for the possibility of earning high returns.


Establishment of a fraudulent contract

Mentioning all medical and health related information is an important disclosure made by the policyholder in the application form. Here's an example of a fraudulent application. "The life assured does not intentionally disclose about his pre-existing illness for which treatment was taken in a hospital for a period of say, 5 years, before taking the policy and which was not disclosed in the proposal form at the time of taking the policy. If the life insurer had known about the pre-existing illness, the life insurer could have rejected the proposal itself and policy would not have been issued. This is an example of denial on fraudulent grounds.

Please mark all your queries / responses to
Information provided on this newsletter has been independently obtained from sources believed to be reliable. However, such information may include inaccuracies, errors or omissions. and its affiliates, information providers or content providers, shall have no liability to you or third parties for the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correct sequencing of information available on this newsletter, or for any decision made or action taken by you in reliance upon such information, or for the delay or interruption of such information. , its affiliates, information providers and content providers shall have no liability for investment decisions or other actions taken or made by you based on the information provided on this newsletter.